Legal Opinion

In re Bridge Construction Services of Florida, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 11, 2014No. Nos. 12cv3536 (JGK), 12cv6285 (JGK), 13cv3123 (JGK)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*378 OPINION AND ORDER

JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge:

These actions in admiralty arose out of injuries that claimant Jose Ayala sustained after falling off a barge named “Hughes 660” on the Hudson River. Ayala contends that he fell off the barge because the barge was jolted by a tugboat. The petitioners, Bridge Construction Services of Florida, Inc. (“Bridge”), Hughes Brothers, Inc. (“Hughes”), and Tutor Perini Corp. (“Tutor Perini”), are purported owners or bareboat charterers of the vessels involved in the incident.

Claimant Jose Ayala and his wife, claimant Teresa Ayala, (collectively, “the…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Diop v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  2. In re Bridge Construction Services of Florida, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  3. In re NaglerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
  4. In re TreanorDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  5. Seemann v. Coastal Environmental Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API