Legal Opinion

Walker v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 19, 1993No. 91-CF-1489, 92-CF-144PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRYOR, Senior Judge:

Appellants, who were co-defendants in a joint trial, were convicted of second-degree murder while armed, in violation of D.C.Code §§ 22-2403, -3202 (1989 Repl.). Both appellants Walker and Abney moved repeatedly, prior to and during the trial, for severance pursuant to Super.Ct.Crim.R. 14, on grounds that their defenses to the charges were irreconcilable.

In addition to their severance claims, each appellant individually claims that the trial court abused its discretion in denying their other respective motions. Appellant Abney, individually, claims that the trial court…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Nelson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Winestock v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Carpenter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ginyard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. McCoy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Sams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Hallums v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API