Legal Opinion

Ginyard v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 6, 2003No. 98-CF-1793, 00-CO-615PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:

Appellant Erik J. Ginyard was indicted along with Ricardo Curtis for the shooting of Laffette Copeland. The theory underlying the indictment was that Curtis furnished the gun with which Ginyard fired the shots. Before trial, Curtis pleaded guilty to a single count of carrying a pistol without a license in exchange for the dismissal of the other counts against him. As part of his plea agreement, Curtis agreed to testify against Ginyard. At Ginyard’s trial, however, the government found itself unable to present Curtis’s testimony when the court upheld his unexpected…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Young v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Joiner-Die v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Stoddard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Long v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Perez v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API