Legal Opinion

Brockmiller v. Brockmiller

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 15, 1943No. Civ. 12218PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

Defendant appeals from orders contained in an interlocutory decree of divorce granted to his wife. He does not contest the correctness of the decree insofar as it granted a divorce, hut maintains that the court abused its discretion in ordering him to pay $50 counsel fees to the wife’s attorney, and $60 a month for the support of the two minor children of the marriage.

Defendant, appellant herein, specifically contends that in an action for divorce the court cannot grant an allowance of counsel fees to a wife (1) without any showing by her of the necessity therefor; (2) when the services were…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dixon v. DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Farrar v. FarrarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. Collins v. WelshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Baker v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. Ward v. GoetzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Gudelj v. GudeljCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Armstrong v. ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Warner v. WarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API