Legal Opinion

Ward v. Goetz

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 9, 1917No. Civ. No. 1812PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

WORKS, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from the judgment. The appellant Goetz and the respondent were formerly husband and wife. Some time prior to February 16, 1911, the respondent commenced an action for separate maintenance against her husband. On the date mentioned the two entered into an agreement to live apart, the instrument also providing for a dismissal of the maintenance suit, and for the payment by the husband to the wife of the sum of fifty dollars each month, so long as they should remain married. As a part of the same transaction the appellant Goetz, as principal, and the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carpenter v. MarkhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Palmer v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Brockmiller v. BrockmillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Palmer v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API