Legal Opinion

Baker v. Baker

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 19, 1923No. Civ. No. 4459PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

This action is one for divorce. The defendant filed a cross-complaint and the court denied each party a decree. In the judgment it was ordered that the plaintiff pay the defendant two hundred dollars as counsel fees in the action, and the appeal is from this order.

Prior to trial the defendant moved the court for an order under section 137 of the Civil Code that she be allowed her counsel fees. It was then stipulated by the parties that decision upon such motion be made at the time of the trial. In the judgment no finding appears as to the property of either party. The finding and order of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hulen v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Krasky v. WollpertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Farrar v. FarrarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Puckett v. PuckettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Brockmiller v. BrockmillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Nelson v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Puckett v. PuckettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API