Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Premo

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 16, 2017No. 06C16178; A162502PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner in this post-conviction case appeals an order of the post-conviction court dated June 21, 2016, denying his motion for a protective order. See Brumwell v. Premo, 355 Or 543, 326 P3d 1177 (2014); Longo v. Premo, 355 Or 525, 326 P3d 1152 (2014) (analyzing OEC 504(4)(c)’s breach of duty exception to attorney-client privilege and concluding that a protective order may be necessary in a post-conviction case to prevent disclosure of privileged information to third parties). Petitioner contends, in part, that the post-conviction court had no jurisdiction to enter an order denying the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Longo v. PremoOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Koller v. SchmaingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Brumwell v. PremoOregon Supreme Court · 2014

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  2. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API