Rains v. Stayton Builders Mart, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHadlock, J.
In the trial court, third-party defendant Weyerhaeuser Company moved, under ORCP 71 B(l)(c) and ORCP 71 C, to set aside several judgments against it, asserting that the judgments had been obtained through fraud on the court. The trial court denied the motions, ruling that the motion under ORCP 71 B(l)(c) was untimely and that the court lacked jurisdiction to hear the motion under ORCP 71 C because of a pending appeal. Weyerhaeuser appeals, challenging those rulings. We agree with both of the trial court’s challenged rulings and, therefore, affirm.
The facts material to our disposition of this…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Waddill v. Anchor Hocking, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
- Waddill v. Anchor Hocking, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rains v. Stayton Builders Mart, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Benavente v. ThayerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- Washington County v. QuerbachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Much v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.