Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Slater v. Stoffel

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1969No. 668A101, 668A102Published

1Concurrence

Concurring Opinion

White, J.

While it is true that an adjudication not on the merits does not preclude relitigation of issues not decided (if the objection which proved fatal in the first action can be avoided in a subsequent action1.) it is nevertheless, *681conclusive as to the points actually decided.2 The federal court decision was that appellants’ cause of action was barred by the six-months limitation of Ind. Acts 1953, ch. 112, § 1401, Burns Ind. Stat. Ann. § 7-801, subsection (a) and that Ind. Acts 1961, ch. 287, § 1, which added subsection (f) creating an exception for tort claims, did not…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Dodge v. GaylordIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Aspden v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
  3. Griffith v. Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  4. Alerding v. AllisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Westfall v. WaitIndiana Supreme Court · 1905

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API