Legal Opinion
People v. Claud
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 20, 1990PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the case remitted to the Appellate Division for consideration of the facts (see, CPL 470.25 [2] [d]; 470.40 [2] [b]).
Following an incident in which defendant operated his vessel in a manner causing serious physical injuries, defendant was charged with violations of Babylon Town Code §§ 86-3 (unregistered vehicle) and 86-4 (careful and prudent operation of a vessel) in Second District Court in Babylon. He was also charged by an information filed in First District Court in Hauppauge with operating a vessel…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Corbin v. HilleryNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Wiley v. AltmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Schmidt v. RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
3Cited by7 opinions
- Northern Indiana Public Service Company v. Aqua Environmental Container Corp. and Joki Leasing, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- Northrup v. RelinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. SkinnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. ClaudAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Matter of McNerlin v. ArgentoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.