Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Roberts

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 28, 1989PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Alexander, J.

We are confronted in this case with the issue whether under the double jeopardy bar of CPL 40.20, a conspiracy prosecution in another jurisdiction bars a later New York prosecution for consummated result offenses arising out of the same criminal transaction. Although the Legislature addressed this *516problem in 1984 by the enactment of CPL 40.20 (2) (g), which excepts from the double jeopardy bar cases in which the prior conspiracy prosecution occurred in "another state”, petitioner argues that because Thomas McNeil’s prior conspiracy prosecution was pursued by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. SheridanSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Doctors Council v. New York City Employees' Retirement SystemNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. New York State Bankers Ass'n v. AlbrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. People v. AbbamonteNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Abraham v. Justices of New York Supreme CourtNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Long v. Adirondack Park AgencyNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. People v. BryantNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Hamilton v. PurserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. McLean v. City of KingstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. People v. ClaudNew York Court of Appeals · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API