Legal Opinion

Dorsey ex rel. Dorsey v. Buchanan

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1981No. 809SC978PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Defendants’ motions for a directed verdict at the close of plaintiff’s evidence presented the question to the trial court for judgment and to us for review as to whether plaintiffs evidence was sufficient to justify a verdict in his favor.

On a motion by defendant for a directed verdict in a jury case, the court must consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff and may grant the motion only if, as a matter of law, the evidence is insufficient to justify a verdict for the plaintiff. All the evidence which tends to support plaintiffs claim must be taken as true…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Dickinson v. PakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Hunt v. Montgomery Ward and Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. American Home Products Corp. v. Howell's Motor Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Winters Ex Rel. Gordon v. BurchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Koonce v. MayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API