Legal Opinion

United States v. Rittweger

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 23, 2003No. 02 CR. 122(JGK)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

KOELTL, District Judge.

The defendants in this case — Thomas M. Rittweger (“Rittweger”), Douglas C. Brandon (“Brandon”), Robert S. DeHaven (“DeHaven”) and Victor M. Wexler (‘Wex-ler”) — were charged in a thirteen-count indictment on January 31, 2002. The Grand Jury returned a superseding indictment on April 9, 2003 (the “Superseding Indictment” or the “Indictment”). 1 While Richard J. Blech (“Blech”) was charged as a defendant in certain counts of the original indictment, he subsequently pleaded guilty to certain counts in that indictment, and was named as a coconspirator but…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. RittwegerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. SattarDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  3. United States v. SattarDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  4. United States v. FordeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  5. United States v. SaadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API