Legal Opinion

United States v. Rittweger

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 23, 2008No. Docket 05-3600-cr(L), 05-3766-cr(CON), 05-3769-cr(CON)PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judge:

This appeal addresses whether the join-der of defendants under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 8(b) (“Rule 8(b)”) is proper when the overwhelming evidence presented at trial concerned proof of a conspiracy that involved some, but not all, of the named defendants. Because the indictment alleged the existence of two conspiracies that shared a common plan or scheme and a substantial identity of facts or participants, we hold that joinder was permissible under Rule 8(b). We further hold that, in light of the relatively straightforward nature of the evidence at issue…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. Certified Environmental Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. OhleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  5. United States v. AdekanbiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API