Legal Opinion

Haidinger-Hayes, Inc. v. Marvin Hime & Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 25, 1962No. Civ. 25895PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.

This is an action for breach of bailment alleged to have resulted from a failure on the part of defendant Marvin Hime and Company, Inc., to return to the plaintiffs’ assured certain articles of jewelry consigned to defendant.

Plaintiff Haidinger-Hayes, Inc., is a California corporation duly authorized as a surplus line broker. Pursuant to an agreement between this plaintiff and certain underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, plaintiff was authorized to write and issue policies of insurance on behalf of these underwriters, to adjust losses and to handle all claims and subrogation matters under such…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brant v. California Dairies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Estate of RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. McCluskey v. WareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. People v. GouldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. P. A. Smith Co. v. MullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Windeler v. Scheers JewelersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Myers v. StephensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Tinney v. TinneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. County of San Diego v. ViloriaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. City of Los Angeles v. SiegelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API