Legal Opinion
In re Carreira
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided April 15, 1976No. Patent Appeal No. 76-525PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LANE, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-10, all of the claims in application serial No. 126,219, filed March 19, 1971, for an “Imaging Process.” We affirm.
Background
The subject matter of the claims is a method of photoelectrophoretic imaging, i. e., a method of preparing a visible image in which electrically photosensitive pigment particles are suspended in a non-conductive liquid carrier. The suspension is exposed to an image and, at the same time, subjected to an electrical potential…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Application of Hans Hilmer, Gerhard Korger, Rudi Weyer and Walter AumullerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Application of Thomas F. FaciusCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- United States v. H. M. Young Associates, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- In re McKellinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Duncan Parking Technologies v. Ips Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- In re BullochCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- Great Northern Energy, Inc. v. Circle Ridge Production, Inc.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016