Legal Opinion
United States v. Juan Rangel
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 20, 2012No. 11-50062PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed July 20, 2012 is AMENDED as follows:
1.At page 8360 of the slip opinion, the following sentence is deleted:
We conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in considering the serious financial impact Rangel’s crimes had on his victims, including the fact that they were unlikely to ever receive any compensatory payments from Rangel.
and replaced with:
We conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in considering the serious financial impact Rangel’s crimes had on his victims.
2. At page 8362 of the slip opinion, the following sentence is deleted:
Because…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. CartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States v. Jose Flores-MejiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Brian RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Dan PetriCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. James JonesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Lavelle PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.