Legal Opinion
United States v. Dan Petri
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 12, 2013No. 11-30337PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The Opinion filed on February 8, 2013, is amended as follows:
Slip opinion page 11, line 21: At the end of this paragraph, insert the following sentence: <In addition, Petri acknowledges that the prior version of Rule 32 covered only objections to the presentence report, and the Advisory Committee made clear that the 2002 amendments were not intended to change the meaning of Rule 32 in ways other than explained in the notes. See Fed.R.Crim.P. 32 advisory committee’s note (“These changes are intended to be stylistic only, except as noted below.”). >
With this amendment, the panel has voted…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. CartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Schiavone v. FortuneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Beech Aircraft Corp. v. RaineySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Dolan v. United States Postal ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Dewayne Bearchild v. Kristy CobbanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Robert Briseno v. Conagra Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- C. B. v. City of SonoraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Republic of Ecuador v. Douglas MacKayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Collins ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.