United States v. James Jones
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge:
Appellants Melvin Butler and James Antonio Jones are each serving lengthy prison sentences for drug offenses. Based on a recent retroactive amendment to the United States Sentencing Guidelines, they sought reductions of those sentences under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Although the district court agreed that it could reduce their sentences, it declined to do so after considering the relevant factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). United States v. Butler, 130 F.Supp.3d 317 (D.D.C. 2015).
Appellants challenge those denials as substantively unreasonable. Before reaching…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- David De Csepel v. Republic of HungaryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Jose RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Jermarcus RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Theresa CaltonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Melvin LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.