Waterloo Creamery v. National Bank of Commerce
District Court, E.D. Michigan
In Equity. Suit by the Waterloo Creamery Company and others--against the National Bank of Commerce of Toledo, Ohio, and others. On motion to dismiss the bill for want of jurisdiction.
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTEE, District Judge.
This cause is before the court on motion ■to dismiss the bill of complaint on the ground'of lack of jurisdiction, ■of this court over the parties hereto. The only question involved is that of jurisdiction.
[1] One of the plaintiffs is a citizen and resident of Iowa, and the other plaintiff is a citizen and resident of Nebraska. One of the defendants (the defendant receiver hereinafter mentioned) is a resident and citizen of Michigan, and of this district; the other defendants being citizens and residents of New York. As, therefore, not all' of the plaintiffs nor all of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jellenik v. Huron Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Camp v. GressSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Ladew v. Tennessee Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Vidal v. South American Securities Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Chase v. WetzlarSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wilson v. BeardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Hannan v. SlushDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1922
- Findlay v. Florida East Coast Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1933