Legal Opinion

In re Warlick

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 12, 2002No. 25556Published

1Per curiam

In this attorney disciplinary matter, the Commission on Lawyer Conduct filed formal charges against respondent,1 regarding numerous matters of misconduct.2 We agree with the Panel’s recommendation that respondent be disbarred from the practice of law.

*151FACTS

Account Matters

In many of the Formal Charges, respondent has admitted that he failed to maintain a proper trust account and that he commingled personal funds with client funds and other funds in his possession. The records of respondent’s Greenville National Bank Special Account3 show the account had a negative balance on at least six…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re ThompsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. United States v. Hal J. WarlickCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  3. In Re LarkinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Matter of HendricksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  5. In the Matter of BowersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API