In re Warlick
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
In this attorney disciplinary matter, the Commission on Lawyer Conduct filed formal charges against respondent,1 regarding numerous matters of misconduct.2 We agree with the Panel’s recommendation that respondent be disbarred from the practice of law.
*151FACTS
Account Matters
In many of the Formal Charges, respondent has admitted that he failed to maintain a proper trust account and that he commingled personal funds with client funds and other funds in his possession. The records of respondent’s Greenville National Bank Special Account3 show the account had a negative balance on at least six…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re ThompsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- United States v. Hal J. WarlickCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- In Re LarkinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Matter of HendricksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- In the Matter of BowersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.