Legal Opinion

In Re Two Anonymous Members of the South Carolina Bar

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 21, 1982No. 21830PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, Chief Justice:

Respondents, Members of the South Carolina Bar and associated together in the practice of law, were charged with conduct which tends to pollute the administration of justice and bring the courts and the legal profession into disrepute, in that they made prohibited contact with the sister of a prospective juror in violation of DR7-108(A & F) of the Supreme Court Rules of Disciplinary Procedure.

DR7-108(A & F), the Rule under which respondents are basically charged, provides as follows:

*478(A) Before the trial of a case a lawyer connected therewith shall not communicate with or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. LeRoux v. EdmundsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  2. Smith v. QUATTLEBAUMSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1953

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Hal J. WarlickCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  2. State v. BryantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  3. In the Matter of RiversSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  4. In the Matter of WarlickSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  5. In Re MitchumSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API