Legal Opinion

Wolfe v. Isbell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 12, 1973No. SC 200PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCALL, Justice.

The defendants appellees have moved this court to strike appellant’s brief or for affirmance of the case or for dismissal of the appeal. They assign as grounds that the brief of the appellant contains no Statement of the Case as required by Supreme Court Rule 9 and that the Statement of Facts is merely argument and does not specifically refer to any one ground of demurrer as being erroneously sustained.

This appeal is taken because of the adverse ruling on a demurrer to the complaint. While we cannot approve of the omissions made in the brief, the sole issue is so clearly…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Dietrich v. Inhabitants of NorthamptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  2. Smith v. BrennanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. Allaire v. St. Luke's HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Sinkler v. KnealeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Puhl v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement v. Johnson Controls, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Justus v. AtchisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Nealis v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  4. Humes v. ClintonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  5. Eich v. Town of Gulf ShoresSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API