Legal Opinion

Kane v. North Carolina Teachers' & State Employees' Comprehensive Major Medical Plan

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 3, 2013No. COA13-73PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Judge.

Procedural History and Factual Background

This appeal arises from an insurer’s denial of an insured’s requests for reimbursement for medical procedures and prescriptions. In late 2007, Plaintiff Elizabeth A. Kane, a forty-one-year-old employee of the *387State of North Carolina, determined that she wanted to have one or more biological children. Because Plaintiff was not in a romantic relationship with a male partner, she anticipated using donor sperm and artificial insemination to become pregnant. Plaintiff’s gynecologist referred her to Carolina Conceptions, a fertility clinic,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeal From the Civil PenaltySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Corum v. University of North CarolinaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Shell Island Homeowners Ass'n v. TomlinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Robins v. Town of HillsboroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  5. Lloyd v. BabbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Halikierra Cmty. Servs. LLC v. N.C. Dep't of Health & Hum. Servs.North Carolina Business Court · 2021
  2. Intersal, Inc. v. HamiltonNorth Carolina Business Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API