Legal Opinion
Heimer v. Antelope Valley Improvement
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided March 18, 2010No. S-08-0169PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KITE, Justice.
[¶ 1] Seott and Connie Heimer claim a water main maintained by the Antelope Valley Improvement and Service District (the District) leaked for several years causing damage to their Campbell County residence. In 2004, the water main broke, allegedly causing additional damage to the Heimers' property. The Heimers filed a governmental claim against the District and subsequently brought suit in district court. The District moved for summary judgment, arguing that the Heimers' action was barred because they failed to file their governmental claim within the statutory time limit. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cathcart v. MeyerWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- REDENZ BY REDENZ v. RosenbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Hiltz v. Robert W. Horn, P.C.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Bell v. SchellWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Beaulieu v. FlorquistWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Adelizzi v. StrattonWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- Robert L. Kroenlein Trust ex rel. Alden v. KirchheferWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- Mountain Cement Co. v. South of Laramie Water & Sewer DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
- Wyoming State Hospital and State of Wyoming v. Mary Romine and Donald Romine, as Guardians and Conservators for and On Behalf of Justina Case, Their WardWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
- Alan G. Moats and Chleo I. Moats v. Professional Assistance, LLC, d/b/a Summit Title Services, Kuzma Success Realty, and P. Olen Snider, Jr.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.