Legal Opinion

Jones v. Rumford

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1964No. 36976PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rummel, J. †

The plaintiff, respondent here, brought this action to enjoin the defendants from operating a chicken breeding plant, and for damages for alleged depreciation in value of his property, for impairment of the use of his property, and for invasion of his privacy. He contended that the defendants’ breeding plant constituted a nuisance because of the existence of offensive odors, flies, insects and rodents, all caused by the plant.

The trial court ruled that the plaintiff was not entitled to a jury as a matter of right because of the equitable aspects of the case, but called a jury in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Morin v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Riblet v. Ideal Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Riblet v. Spokane-Portland Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Ebur v. Alloy Metal Wire Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lakey v. Puget Sound Energy, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Claude v. Weaver Construction CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  3. Tiegs v. WattsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Tiegs v. WattsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Buchanan v. Simplot Feeders LPWashington Supreme Court · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API