Legal Opinion
Kuns v. City of Ukiah
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 4, 2000No. A087470PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
94 Cal.Rptr.2d 359 (2000)
79 Cal.App.4th 899
Christine Lynette KUNS et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
CITY OF URIAH, Defendant and Respondent.
Billy Mack Clark et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
City of Ukiah, Defendant and Respondent.
No. A087470.
Court of Appeal, First District, Division One.
April 7, 2000.
As Modified on Denial of Rehearing May 4, 2000.
Review Denied July 19, 2000.[*]
Johnson & DeMarchi, Thomas F. Johnson, Linda S. Mitlyng, Anacortes, WA, William B. Phillips, Healdsburg, Attorneys for Appellants/Plaintiffs Christine Kuns et al., Billy Mack Clark et al.
Shapiro, Galvin & Shapiro,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Mitchell v. GonzalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Bigbee v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1983
- Mosley v. Arden Farms Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Richardson v. HamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kyocera Corp. v. Prudential-Bache Trade Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Kyocera Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Prudential-Bache Trade Services, Inc., Formerly Prudential-Bache Trade Corporation, Prudential Capital & Investment Services, Inc., Lapine Technology Corporation, and Lapine Holding Company, Inc., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees. Lapine Technology Corporation v. Kyocera Corporation, Lapine Technology Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant-Appellee v. Kyocera Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Plaintiff-Appellant v. Prudential-Bache Trade Services, Inc., Fba Prudential-Bache Trade Corporation Prudential Capital & Investment Services, Inc., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002