State v. Burgin
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
FRYE, Justice.
Defendant raises two issues on this appeal. He first argues that the trial court erred in allowing the State to ask certain *405questions during cross-examination of defendant and certain of defendant’s witnesses. Secondly, defendant contends that the trial court erroneously instructed the jury when the trial court denied the jury’s request to have certain testimony read to it after beginning deliberations. After reviewing the record, the parties’ briefs and arguments, and the relevant law, we find that the actions complained of by defendant do not constitute error on the part of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. HardySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. AlbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. SmallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. BraxtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. NoblesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- State v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. GarnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.