Bobby Berosini, Ltd. v. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This case involves an appeal and cross-appeal from the district court’s order granting respondents/cross-appellants, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), and Performing Animal Welfare Society (PAWS), $144,000.00 and $42,000.00, respectively, in attorney’s fees, and $228,625.48 and $6589.91, respectively, in costs.
On appeal, Bobby Berosini (Berosini) contends that the district court abused its discretion in awarding several items of respondents/cross-appellants’ costs and in awarding attorney’s fees pursuant to NRS 18.010(2)(b) as a sanction for prosecuting a frivolous…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Western United Realty, Inc. v. IsaacsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Bergmann v. BoyceNevada Supreme Court · 1993
- People for Ethical Treatment of Animals v. Bobby Berosini Ltd.Nevada Supreme Court · 1995
- Allianz Insurance v. GagnonNevada Supreme Court · 1993
- Rowland v. LepireNevada Supreme Court · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by47 opinions
- Sheehan & Sheehan v. Nelson Malley & Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
- Thomas v. City of North Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Albios v. Horizon Communities, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Village Builders 96, L. P. v. U.S. Laboratories, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
- Gilman v. Nevada State Board of Veterinary Medical ExaminersNevada Supreme Court · 2004
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.