Legal Opinion

Bobby Berosini, Ltd. v. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1998No. 29103PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This case involves an appeal and cross-appeal from the district court’s order granting respondents/cross-appellants, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), and Performing Animal Welfare Society (PAWS), $144,000.00 and $42,000.00, respectively, in attorney’s fees, and $228,625.48 and $6589.91, respectively, in costs.

On appeal, Bobby Berosini (Berosini) contends that the district court abused its discretion in awarding several items of respondents/cross-appellants’ costs and in awarding attorney’s fees pursuant to NRS 18.010(2)(b) as a sanction for prosecuting a frivolous…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Western United Realty, Inc. v. IsaacsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Bergmann v. BoyceNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People for Ethical Treatment of Animals v. Bobby Berosini Ltd.Nevada Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Allianz Insurance v. GagnonNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Rowland v. LepireNevada Supreme Court · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by47 opinions

  1. Sheehan & Sheehan v. Nelson Malley & Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Thomas v. City of North Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Albios v. Horizon Communities, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Village Builders 96, L. P. v. U.S. Laboratories, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Gilman v. Nevada State Board of Veterinary Medical ExaminersNevada Supreme Court · 2004

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API