Legal Opinion

In re Bean

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1988No. 94S00-8805-JD-486PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The Indiana Commission on Judicial Qualifications (Commission) and the Respondent the Honorable Harold E. Bean, have entered into and now tender for this Court's approval, a Conditional Agreement for Discipline. The agreement emanates from a "Notice of the Institution of Formal Proceedings-Statement of Charges" under the authority of Admission and Discipline Rule 25 and pursuant to 1.C. 33-2.1-6-10.

On May 18, 1988, charges were filed by the Commission alleging that Respondent engaged in conduct which demonstrated willful misconduct in office, willful failure to perform his duties, and conduct…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matter of DruryIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In the Matter of: Harold E. BeanIndiana Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API