Legal Opinion

Rice v. Danas, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 6, 1999No. COA98-726PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Judge.

The following issues are raised by the parties on appeal: (I) whether the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion for sanctions; (II) whether the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion for attorney fees; (III) whether the plaintiff (A) appealed in apt time from the 5 December 1996 judgment entered on the jury verdict, and (B) from the 19 December 1997 order of the trial court denying her motion for sanctions. We note that despite her notice of appeal, the plaintiff did not assign error to the trial court’s award of costs, including deposition costs, to defendant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Bryson v. SullivanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Griffin v. SweetCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Pee Dee Health Care, P.A. v. Estate of ThompsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API