Legal Opinion
Passamaquoddy Tribe v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 19, 2008No. 06-942 LPublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSH, Judge.
The court has before it Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1500, for which an evidentiary hearing was held February 1, 2008. Briefing on defendant’s motion was re-opened for simultaneous post-hearing sur-reply briefs, filed on March 20, 1998. For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is granted and plaintiffs complaint in this court must be dismissed, without prejudice.
BACKGROUND
On December 29, 2006, the last day the Clerk’s Office of the United States Court of Federal Claims (COFC or CFC) was open for business…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Shapiro v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Ashbritt, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Nez Perce Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Starr International Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Yankton Sioux Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.