Legal Opinion

Smith v. Prutton

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 7, 1942No. 8949PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONS, Circuit Judge.

The appellant being the unsuccessful party to a patent interference proceeding in the Patent Office, filed his bill in equity in the District Court under § 4915, R.S., 35 U.b.C.A. § 63, praying to be adjudged entitled to the count in issue. This he did under compulsion of a notice filed by the appellees with the Commissioner of Patents under 35 U.S.C.A., § 59a, that they elected to have all further proceedings conducted *80as provided in § 63. The controversy was submitted on the Patent Office record supplemented by stipulated facts, and the District Court entered a decree…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. General Electric Co. v. Hoskins Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1915
  4. Butler v. ShawU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1884
  5. Cleveland Trust Co. v. BerryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
  2. Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Mfg. Co. v. Paine & Williams Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  3. Zalkind v. ScheinmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API