Smith v. Prutton
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, Circuit Judge.
The appellant being the unsuccessful party to a patent interference proceeding in the Patent Office, filed his bill in equity in the District Court under § 4915, R.S., 35 U.b.C.A. § 63, praying to be adjudged entitled to the count in issue. This he did under compulsion of a notice filed by the appellees with the Commissioner of Patents under 35 U.S.C.A., § 59a, that they elected to have all further proceedings conducted *80as provided in § 63. The controversy was submitted on the Patent Office record supplemented by stipulated facts, and the District Court entered a decree…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- General Electric Co. v. Hoskins Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1915
- Butler v. ShawU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1884
- Cleveland Trust Co. v. BerryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
- Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Mfg. Co. v. Paine & Williams Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
- Zalkind v. ScheinmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948