Legal Opinion

Marsh v. Riley

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1936No. 8397PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hatcher, President:

Charging the landlord with knowingly maintaining an unsafe water-heater in his tenement house, the plaintiff recovered a verdict for injuries allegedly occasioned by the heater. The trial court set the verdict aside.

Several rental apartments had a common bathroom. The bath water was heated in a tank by a gas stove, located about fourteen * inches off the bathroom floor near the spigot end of the bathtub. The stove door had no latch and without a fastening of some kind would not remain closed. According to evidence for defendants, the door was provided with an effective wire…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dicken v. Liverpool Salt & Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Weaver Mercantile Co. v. ThurmondWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Wardman v. HanlonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1922
  4. Tugman v. Riverside & Dan River Cotton MillsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  5. Quisenberry v. Gulf Production Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Andrick v. Town of BuckhannonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Teller v. McCoyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Jack v. FrittsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Cowan v. One Hour Valet, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Haba v. Big Arm Bar and Grill, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API