Legal Opinion

Quisenberry v. Gulf Production Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 9, 1933No. 1131PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKMAN, Chief Justice.

Chester Quisenberry, a minor, brought this suit through his father, L. E. Quisenberry, as next friend, against the Gulf Production Company for damages sustained by the minor while playing upon a frame insecurely placed on a tubing rack, which rack and frame, it was alleged, constituted together an inherently dangerous instrumentality attractive to children of immature years. Upon the-conclusion of appellant’s evidence, the trial court sustained a motion of appellee for a peremptory instruction, and upon the verdict returned in obedience to such instruction judgment was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bransom's adm'r v. LabrotCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1884
  2. O'Connor v. AndrewsTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Perez v. RabaudTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. G., H. & H. R'y Co. v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Stimpson v. Bartex Pipe Line Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Banker v. McLaughlinTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Gulf Production Co. v. QuisenberryTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Sorrentino v. McNeillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. Marsh v. RileyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API