Wardman v. Hanlon
District Court, District of Columbia
Appeal from tlie Supreme Court of the District of Columbia. Separate actions by Mary A. T. Hanlon and by J. Leo Hanlon against Harry Wardman, to recover damages for personal injuries to the plaintiff in the first action. Judgment for the plaintiffs in each action, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
SMYTPI, Chief Justice.
These cases were submitted on the same record. Mary A. T. Hanlon, plaintiff in the first case, is the wife of the appellee, plaintiff in the second one. She averred in her declaration that the defendant, at the time of the accident which forms the basis of the action, was in the control of, and operating, an apartment house in Washington; that she was then in the lawful possession and *990occupancy of an apartment therein, under a lease from the defendant to her husband, for the use of himself and family; that the apartment included a bathroom, equipped with the usual toilet…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- B. Shoninger Co. v. MannIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
- Security Savings & Commercial Bank v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1919
- Henry v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1921
- Whittenton Manuf'g Co. v. Memphis & Ohio River Packet Co.United States Circuit Court · 1884
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Maki v. Murray HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1932
- Jerome S. Murray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Pessagno v. Euclid Inv. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Housing Authority of Birmingham Dist. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Weller, Exrx. v. WorstallOhio Supreme Court · 1935
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.