Legal Opinion

Pestock v. State Farm Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided January 19, 1984No. 55,155PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action brought by plaintiff to recover no-fault benefits from the defendant insurance company. The plaintiff has appealed from an order of the court sustaining the defendant’s motion to dismiss.

The lawsuit arises out of an incident that occurred in front of plaintiff s house in which plaintiff s minor daughter was struck and fatally injured by a car being driven by George Mitchell. Plaintiff neither observed nor heard the accident, but was told of its occurrence and arrived at the scene a few minutes later. Plaintiff subsequently required psychiatric care. There is now pending in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
  2. Dougan, Administratrix v. McGrewSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. Kansas Gas and Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  2. Cady v. SchrollSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  3. Scott E. McIntosh and Steven R. McIntosh v. Scottsdale Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  4. Dillon Companies, Inc. v. Royal Indem. Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2005
  5. Three Ten Enterprises, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API