Legal Opinion
Dillon Companies, Inc. v. Royal Indem. Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided April 8, 2005No. 03-1366-DWBPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BOSTWICK, United States Magistrate Judge.
The Court now considers Defendant’s and Plaintiffs’ cross motions for partial summary judgment. This is an insurance coverage case where the parties have consented to trial before a magistrate judge pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). (Doc. 13.) Defendant filed its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, seeking favorable disposition of the issue of its duty to indemnify Plaintiffs, and reserving for trial the issue of its duty to defend Plaintiffs in the underlying case. (Doe. 34.) Plaintiffs filed a Response in Opposition to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Catholic Diocese of Dodge City v. RaymerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
- Scott E. McIntosh and Steven R. McIntosh v. Scottsdale Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc. v. L.H. Bolduc Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. Vita Craft Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2012
- Great Plains Ventures, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2016
- Huber Engineered Woods, LLC v. Canal InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- BancInsure, Inc. v. McCaffreeDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.