Three Ten Enterprises, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Royse, J.:
Three Ten Enterprises, Inc., Foam Form (Three Ten) brought this action against State Farm Fire & Casualty Company (State Farm) to recover losses insured under the employee dishonesty coverage contained in a business policy. State Farm filed a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The district court denied State Farm’s motion and later entered judgment against State Farm. State Farm appeals, and Three Ten cross-appeals.
Three Ten is a limited partnership organized under the laws of the State of Kansas. Three Ten does business under the name Three Ten Insulated Forms in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Foulk v. Colonial TerraceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1994
- Volt Delta Resources, Inc. v. DevineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
- John Doe v. National Medical ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Merriman v. Crompton Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- Kluin v. American Suzuki Motor Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- Thompson v. Jiffy Lube International, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2007
- Novak v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001
- Etienne v. Wolverine Tube, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.