Legal Opinion

Three Ten Enterprises, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 11, 1997No. 75,483PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Royse, J.:

Three Ten Enterprises, Inc., Foam Form (Three Ten) brought this action against State Farm Fire & Casualty Company (State Farm) to recover losses insured under the employee dishonesty coverage contained in a business policy. State Farm filed a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The district court denied State Farm’s motion and later entered judgment against State Farm. State Farm appeals, and Three Ten cross-appeals.

Three Ten is a limited partnership organized under the laws of the State of Kansas. Three Ten does business under the name Three Ten Insulated Forms in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Foulk v. Colonial TerraceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1994
  4. Volt Delta Resources, Inc. v. DevineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  5. John Doe v. National Medical ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Merriman v. Crompton Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. Kluin v. American Suzuki Motor Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  3. Thompson v. Jiffy Lube International, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2007
  4. Novak v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001
  5. Etienne v. Wolverine Tube, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API