Legal Opinion
Vort v. Hollander
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 9, 1992PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
257 N.J. Super. 56 (1992)
607 A.2d 1339
ROBERT A. VORT, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
MYRON HOLLANDER AND CECEILE HOLLANDER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. DENNIS ALAN CIPRIANO, PLAINTIFF-INTERVENOR,
v.
MYRON HOLLANDER, CECEILE HOLLANDER AND ROBERT A. VORT, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted May 19, 1992.
Decided June 9, 1992.
Before Judges PRESSLER, SHEBELL and SKILLMAN.
Charles J. Mysak, attorney for appellants.
Voorhees & Acciavatti, attorneys for respondent (Robert W. McAndrew, of counsel; Peter A. Ouda, on the brief).
Dennis Alan Cipriano, intervenor, pro se, filed a statement…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Application of LiVolsiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Fenwick v. Kay American Jeep, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Neveroski v. BlairNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Frahm v. UrkovichAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Lamb v. BarbourNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- DiCarlo v. St. Mary HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Hoffman v. Asseenontv. Com, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
- Cripe v. LeiterIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Managed Care LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2003
- MacEdo v. Dello RussoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.