Legal Opinion

In re Feeley

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1991No. SB-88-0063-D, Disc.Comm. No. 87-0162PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CAMERON, Justice.

I. JURISDICTION

Respondent, James B. Feeley, appeals a decision of the Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Arizona (Commission) recommending that he be suspended from the practice of law for six months, that as a condition precedent to reinstatement he pay restitution to his client, and ordering him to pay costs of $2,152.60 to the State Bar of Arizona (Bar). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 17A A.R.S. Sup.Ct. Rules, rule 53(e).

II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The facts of the violation are not in dispute. In March 1984, Mr. and Mrs. Frederick Aldorasi (the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, AndersonArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, CardenasArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. The Florida Bar in Re InglisSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  4. Matter of ZangArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  5. In Re ZangArizona Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, CarrascoArizona Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API