Legal Opinion
In Re Zang
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided December 27, 1990No. SB-89-0051-D, SB-90-0017-D. Disc. Comm. Nos. 85-1121, 85-1445 and 85-1326PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CORCORAN, Justice.
Jurisdiction
The Disciplinary Commission recommended that Stephen M. Zang (respondent) be suspended from the practice of law for one year in matter No. 85-1121, disbarred and ordered to pay restitution in matter No. 85-1445, and disbarred for his conduct in matter No. 85-1326. Because respondent failed to appeal from the Commission’s recommendations, these matters were submitted for review on the record. See rule 53(e), Rules of the Arizona Supreme Court. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 3 and art. 6, § 5(3).
We note that we have previously disbarred…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of NevilleArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, PappasArizona Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, KerstingArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Matter of ArrickArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona ZangArizona Supreme Court · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- Maria Brandon v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Matter of AugensteinArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- In re FeeleyArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, GrantArizona Supreme Court · 1991