Legal Opinion
Matter of Zang
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided July 8, 1987No. SB-86-0014-DPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.
In 1982 the State Bar charged attorneys C. Peter Whitmer and Stephen M. Zang (“respondents”) with numerous ethical violations. The charges were presented to Special Local Administrative Committee S-25 of the State Bar (the “Committee”), which found Zang and Whitmer guilty of six ethical violations. The Committee recommended that Zang be suspended from the practice of law for one year and that Whitmer be suspended for six months. See Former Rules 31-35, Ariz.R.S.Ct., 17A A.R.S. 1
Zang and Whitmer presented objections to the Committee’s findings and recommendations to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re: Robert B. SurrickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Matter of RivkindArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Matter of AckelArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Matter of HooverArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re LoronaArizona Supreme Court · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.