Legal Opinion

Lofton v. McNeil Consumer & Specialty Pharmaceuticals

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 22, 2012No. 10-10956PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDITH H. JONES, Chief Judge:

Christopher M. Lofton tragically died from a rare disease called Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (“TEN”) after taking Motrin. Lofton’s wife and children brought suit against the Appellees asserting that Motrin caused the disease and the Appellees had failed to warn consumers about the risk of these severe autoimmune allergic reactions. The district court entered summary judgment for the Appellees. The only issue on appeal is whether the district court correctly found that federal law preempts a Texas tort reform law that requires plaintiffs to assert, in failure to warn…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Yanise Germain v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, IncCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  2. Thomas Mckay v. Novartis Pharmaceutical CorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. Walter TeelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  4. Trejo v. Johnson, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. Murthy v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2012

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API