Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rice v. Farmers State Bank

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 24, 1950No. 16,358Published

1DissentJustice Stone

Experience is increasingly convincing to me that the court should, except in extraordinary circumstances, decide cases on the issues submitted, rather than upon unargued grounds which may suggest themselves to the court. As stated long ago by Elliott, J., in Townsend v. Fulton Irrigating Ditch Co., 17 Colo. 142, 29 Pac. 453, “In general, it is inexpedient and contrary to good practice to attempt to review a cause, except so far as counsel give their assistance by brief and argument,” and, even where error is specifically assigned, we have repeatedly held that it will not be considered on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Edwards v. QuackenbushSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
  2. Townsend v. Fulton Irrigating Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  3. Wheeler, Osgood & Co. v. LagerWashington Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API