Legal Opinion
State v. Cameron
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided December 29, 1972No. 7214SC771PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
Defendant assigns as error the. denial of his motions for a bill of particulars. The record discloses that on 20 September 1971 defendant made a motion .in writing that the State be ordered:
“[T]o furnish the Defendant with a Bill of Particulars setting forth accurately and in detail the time, place, amount, and price paid and the names of other persons that the State contends were present when the alleged offense was alleged to have been committed.”
This motion was denied by Judge McKinnon on 24 September 1971 and the State was ordered “to furnish all names of witnesses.” During…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. StepneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. OvermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. SpenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. ScalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. McDougaldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. ChavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. HaltomCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. CherryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. WoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973