Legal Opinion

Wolfson Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 14, 1950No. Appeal, 127PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

The Board refused the appellant’s claim for unemployment benefits on the ground that leaving her employment was voluntary on her part and without good cause, within the meaning of §402(b) of the Unemployment Compensation Law as amended by the Act of June 30, 1947, P.L. 1186, 43 PS §802.

These facts are undisputed: Claimant had been employed by Luz Luball, Inc., as a saleswoman for almost fifteen months. She originally applied for work on a part time basis and she accepted employment on her understanding that she was to work but three days a week. But immediately after she…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sturdevant Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Mattey v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Kaylock Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Teicher Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Wescoe Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Allen Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Sledzianowski Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Roby v. Potlatch Forests, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Novel Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Forsht Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API