Legal Opinion

State v. Irons

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 17, 2000No. 43259-1-IPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J.

A self-defense instruction that requires the jury to find that the defendant reasonably believed that the victim (rather than the victim and those whom the defendant reasonably believed were acting in concert with the victim) intended to inflict death or great personal injury precludes the jury from considering the defendant’s right to act upon reasonable appearances in a multiple assailant attack, thereby failing to make the relevant legal standard manifestly apparent to the average juror. The trial court in this case erred by giving such an instruction and the error was not harmless.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. State v. WanrowWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. JanesWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. AcostaWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. HutchinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. StuddWashington Supreme Court · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  2. State v. IronsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. State v. BlakelyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. State v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API