Legal Opinion

State v. Rodriguez

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 15, 2004No. 20717-0-IIIPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sweeney, A.C.J.

Jury instructions must “more than adequately” inform the jury of the law on self-defense in order to pass appellate scrutiny. State v. Walden, 131 Wn.2d 469, 473, 932 P.2d 1237 (1997). Here, the jury could have believed that in order for Refujio Abel Rodriguez to act in self-defense, he had to fear he was in actual danger of death or serious permanent disfigurement or loss of a body part or function. That reduced the burden on the State to disprove self-defense. We therefore reverse.

FACTS

Christopher Van Dinter confronted Refujio Rodriguez about the noise he was making outside…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. AlleryWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. StuddWashington Supreme Court · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. KylloWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. KylloWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. State v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. State v. RomeroNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API