Legal Opinion

State v. Rodriguez

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 15, 2004No. 20717-0-IIIPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

87 P.3d 1201 (2004)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Refujio Abel RODRIGUEZ, Appellant.

No. 20717-0-III.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Three.

April 15, 2004.

James E. Egan, Attorney at Law, Kennewick, WA, for Appellant.

David W. Corkrum, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, Pasco, WA, for Respondent.

OPINION PUBLISHED IN PART

SWEENEY, A.C.J.

Jury instructions must "more than adequately" inform the jury of the law on self-defense in order to pass appellate scrutiny. State v. Walden, 131 Wash.2d 469, 473, 932 P.2d 1237 (1997). Here, the jury could have believed that in order for Refujio…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. AlleryWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. StuddWashington Supreme Court · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. KylloWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. KylloWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. State v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. State v. RomeroNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API